Essentials in the acquisition, interpretation, and reporting of plant metabolite profiles

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

Standard

Essentials in the acquisition, interpretation, and reporting of plant metabolite profiles. / Çiçek, Serhat S.; Mangoni, Alfonso; Hanschen, Franziska S.; Agerbirk, Niels; Zidorn, Christian.

In: Phytochemistry, Vol. 220, 114004, 2024.

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Çiçek, SS, Mangoni, A, Hanschen, FS, Agerbirk, N & Zidorn, C 2024, 'Essentials in the acquisition, interpretation, and reporting of plant metabolite profiles', Phytochemistry, vol. 220, 114004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2024.114004

APA

Çiçek, S. S., Mangoni, A., Hanschen, F. S., Agerbirk, N., & Zidorn, C. (2024). Essentials in the acquisition, interpretation, and reporting of plant metabolite profiles. Phytochemistry, 220, [114004]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2024.114004

Vancouver

Çiçek SS, Mangoni A, Hanschen FS, Agerbirk N, Zidorn C. Essentials in the acquisition, interpretation, and reporting of plant metabolite profiles. Phytochemistry. 2024;220. 114004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2024.114004

Author

Çiçek, Serhat S. ; Mangoni, Alfonso ; Hanschen, Franziska S. ; Agerbirk, Niels ; Zidorn, Christian. / Essentials in the acquisition, interpretation, and reporting of plant metabolite profiles. In: Phytochemistry. 2024 ; Vol. 220.

Bibtex

@article{801db7a6b1594e79b4a528bd8449a3e5,
title = "Essentials in the acquisition, interpretation, and reporting of plant metabolite profiles",
abstract = "Plant metabolite profiling reveals the diversity of secondary or specialized metabolites in the plant kingdom with its hundreds of thousands of species. Specialized plant metabolites constitute a vast class of chemicals posing significant challenges in analytical chemistry. In order to be of maximum scientific relevance, reports dealing with these compounds and their source species must be transparent, make use of standards and reference materials, and be based on correctly and traceably identified plant material. Essential aspects in qualitative plant metabolite profiling include: (i) critical review of previous literature and a reasoned sampling strategy; (ii) transparent plant sampling with wild material documented by vouchers in public herbaria and, optimally, seed banks; (iii) if possible, inclusion of generally available reference plant material; (iv) transparent, documented state-of-the art chemical analysis, ideally including chemical reference standards; (v) testing for artefacts during preparative extraction and isolation, using gentle analytical methods; (vi) careful chemical data interpretation, avoiding over- and misinterpretation and taking into account phytochemical complexity when assigning identification confidence levels, and (vii) taking all previous scientific knowledge into account in reporting the scientific data. From the current stage of the phytochemical literature, selected comments and suggestions are given. In the past, proposed revisions of botanical taxonomy were sometimes based on metabolite profiles, but this approach (“chemosystematics” or “chemotaxonomy”) is outdated due to the advent of DNA sequence-based phylogenies. In contrast, systematic comparisons of plant metabolite profiles in a known phylogenetic framework remain relevant. This approach, known as chemophenetics, allows characterizing species and clades based on their array of specialized metabolites, aids in deducing the evolution of biosynthetic pathways and coevolution, and can serve in identifying new sources of rare and economically interesting natural products.",
keywords = "Chemophenetics, Chemosystematics, Chemotaxonomy, Confidence levels, Interpretation, Mass spectrometry, Misidentification, NMR, Plant metabolite profiling, References, Standards, Transparency",
author = "{\c C}i{\c c}ek, {Serhat S.} and Alfonso Mangoni and Hanschen, {Franziska S.} and Niels Agerbirk and Christian Zidorn",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2024 The Authors",
year = "2024",
doi = "10.1016/j.phytochem.2024.114004",
language = "English",
volume = "220",
journal = "Phytochemistry",
issn = "0031-9422",
publisher = "Pergamon Press",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Essentials in the acquisition, interpretation, and reporting of plant metabolite profiles

AU - Çiçek, Serhat S.

AU - Mangoni, Alfonso

AU - Hanschen, Franziska S.

AU - Agerbirk, Niels

AU - Zidorn, Christian

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 The Authors

PY - 2024

Y1 - 2024

N2 - Plant metabolite profiling reveals the diversity of secondary or specialized metabolites in the plant kingdom with its hundreds of thousands of species. Specialized plant metabolites constitute a vast class of chemicals posing significant challenges in analytical chemistry. In order to be of maximum scientific relevance, reports dealing with these compounds and their source species must be transparent, make use of standards and reference materials, and be based on correctly and traceably identified plant material. Essential aspects in qualitative plant metabolite profiling include: (i) critical review of previous literature and a reasoned sampling strategy; (ii) transparent plant sampling with wild material documented by vouchers in public herbaria and, optimally, seed banks; (iii) if possible, inclusion of generally available reference plant material; (iv) transparent, documented state-of-the art chemical analysis, ideally including chemical reference standards; (v) testing for artefacts during preparative extraction and isolation, using gentle analytical methods; (vi) careful chemical data interpretation, avoiding over- and misinterpretation and taking into account phytochemical complexity when assigning identification confidence levels, and (vii) taking all previous scientific knowledge into account in reporting the scientific data. From the current stage of the phytochemical literature, selected comments and suggestions are given. In the past, proposed revisions of botanical taxonomy were sometimes based on metabolite profiles, but this approach (“chemosystematics” or “chemotaxonomy”) is outdated due to the advent of DNA sequence-based phylogenies. In contrast, systematic comparisons of plant metabolite profiles in a known phylogenetic framework remain relevant. This approach, known as chemophenetics, allows characterizing species and clades based on their array of specialized metabolites, aids in deducing the evolution of biosynthetic pathways and coevolution, and can serve in identifying new sources of rare and economically interesting natural products.

AB - Plant metabolite profiling reveals the diversity of secondary or specialized metabolites in the plant kingdom with its hundreds of thousands of species. Specialized plant metabolites constitute a vast class of chemicals posing significant challenges in analytical chemistry. In order to be of maximum scientific relevance, reports dealing with these compounds and their source species must be transparent, make use of standards and reference materials, and be based on correctly and traceably identified plant material. Essential aspects in qualitative plant metabolite profiling include: (i) critical review of previous literature and a reasoned sampling strategy; (ii) transparent plant sampling with wild material documented by vouchers in public herbaria and, optimally, seed banks; (iii) if possible, inclusion of generally available reference plant material; (iv) transparent, documented state-of-the art chemical analysis, ideally including chemical reference standards; (v) testing for artefacts during preparative extraction and isolation, using gentle analytical methods; (vi) careful chemical data interpretation, avoiding over- and misinterpretation and taking into account phytochemical complexity when assigning identification confidence levels, and (vii) taking all previous scientific knowledge into account in reporting the scientific data. From the current stage of the phytochemical literature, selected comments and suggestions are given. In the past, proposed revisions of botanical taxonomy were sometimes based on metabolite profiles, but this approach (“chemosystematics” or “chemotaxonomy”) is outdated due to the advent of DNA sequence-based phylogenies. In contrast, systematic comparisons of plant metabolite profiles in a known phylogenetic framework remain relevant. This approach, known as chemophenetics, allows characterizing species and clades based on their array of specialized metabolites, aids in deducing the evolution of biosynthetic pathways and coevolution, and can serve in identifying new sources of rare and economically interesting natural products.

KW - Chemophenetics

KW - Chemosystematics

KW - Chemotaxonomy

KW - Confidence levels

KW - Interpretation

KW - Mass spectrometry

KW - Misidentification

KW - NMR

KW - Plant metabolite profiling

KW - References

KW - Standards

KW - Transparency

U2 - 10.1016/j.phytochem.2024.114004

DO - 10.1016/j.phytochem.2024.114004

M3 - Review

C2 - 38331135

AN - SCOPUS:85185282582

VL - 220

JO - Phytochemistry

JF - Phytochemistry

SN - 0031-9422

M1 - 114004

ER -

ID: 387741865