Comparison of Quantitative and Semiquantitative Methods in Source Identification Following the OSPAR Oil Spill, in Paraná, Brazil

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapterResearchpeer-review

Standard

Comparison of Quantitative and Semiquantitative Methods in Source Identification Following the OSPAR Oil Spill, in Paraná, Brazil. / Gallotta, Fabiana D.C.; Christensen, Jan H.

Oil Spill Environmental Forensics Case Studies. Elsevier, 2017. p. 515-561.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapterResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Gallotta, FDC & Christensen, JH 2017, Comparison of Quantitative and Semiquantitative Methods in Source Identification Following the OSPAR Oil Spill, in Paraná, Brazil. in Oil Spill Environmental Forensics Case Studies. Elsevier, pp. 515-561. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804434-6.00025-2

APA

Gallotta, F. D. C., & Christensen, J. H. (2017). Comparison of Quantitative and Semiquantitative Methods in Source Identification Following the OSPAR Oil Spill, in Paraná, Brazil. In Oil Spill Environmental Forensics Case Studies (pp. 515-561). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804434-6.00025-2

Vancouver

Gallotta FDC, Christensen JH. Comparison of Quantitative and Semiquantitative Methods in Source Identification Following the OSPAR Oil Spill, in Paraná, Brazil. In Oil Spill Environmental Forensics Case Studies. Elsevier. 2017. p. 515-561 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804434-6.00025-2

Author

Gallotta, Fabiana D.C. ; Christensen, Jan H. / Comparison of Quantitative and Semiquantitative Methods in Source Identification Following the OSPAR Oil Spill, in Paraná, Brazil. Oil Spill Environmental Forensics Case Studies. Elsevier, 2017. pp. 515-561

Bibtex

@inbook{cc6263192547443ba0c85f45ff41710f,
title = "Comparison of Quantitative and Semiquantitative Methods in Source Identification Following the OSPAR Oil Spill, in Paran{\'a}, Brazil",
abstract = "Forensic source identification of hydrocarbons present in the environment has been a major challenge for scientists as acute oil spills tend to claim the greatest need of robust conclusions, since these events' legal and financial consequences are quite adverse for the responsible parties. The aim of this study was to compare quantitative and semiquantitative methods in source identification following the OSPAR crude oil pipeline spill, in Paran{\'a}, Brazil in July 2000, which occurred in an area of chronic pollution. Diagnostic ratios calculated from the concentrations of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, from heights and areas of chromatographic peaks and a chemometric method based on principal component analysis of preprocessed and combined sections of selected ion chromatograms were used to identify hydrocarbon sources. The conclusion summarizes the main advantages, disadvantages and indicates the best opportunities of application, and the expected results for each method.",
keywords = "Chemometrics, CHEMSIC, Crude oil, Diagnostic ratios, Forensic, Igua{\c c}u River, OSINET, Petroleum biomarkers, Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), Principal component analysis (PCA), Selected ion chromatograms (SICs), Weathering",
author = "Gallotta, {Fabiana D.C.} and Christensen, {Jan H.}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1016/B978-0-12-804434-6.00025-2",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780128044346",
pages = "515--561",
booktitle = "Oil Spill Environmental Forensics Case Studies",
publisher = "Elsevier",
address = "Netherlands",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Comparison of Quantitative and Semiquantitative Methods in Source Identification Following the OSPAR Oil Spill, in Paraná, Brazil

AU - Gallotta, Fabiana D.C.

AU - Christensen, Jan H.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Forensic source identification of hydrocarbons present in the environment has been a major challenge for scientists as acute oil spills tend to claim the greatest need of robust conclusions, since these events' legal and financial consequences are quite adverse for the responsible parties. The aim of this study was to compare quantitative and semiquantitative methods in source identification following the OSPAR crude oil pipeline spill, in Paraná, Brazil in July 2000, which occurred in an area of chronic pollution. Diagnostic ratios calculated from the concentrations of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, from heights and areas of chromatographic peaks and a chemometric method based on principal component analysis of preprocessed and combined sections of selected ion chromatograms were used to identify hydrocarbon sources. The conclusion summarizes the main advantages, disadvantages and indicates the best opportunities of application, and the expected results for each method.

AB - Forensic source identification of hydrocarbons present in the environment has been a major challenge for scientists as acute oil spills tend to claim the greatest need of robust conclusions, since these events' legal and financial consequences are quite adverse for the responsible parties. The aim of this study was to compare quantitative and semiquantitative methods in source identification following the OSPAR crude oil pipeline spill, in Paraná, Brazil in July 2000, which occurred in an area of chronic pollution. Diagnostic ratios calculated from the concentrations of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, from heights and areas of chromatographic peaks and a chemometric method based on principal component analysis of preprocessed and combined sections of selected ion chromatograms were used to identify hydrocarbon sources. The conclusion summarizes the main advantages, disadvantages and indicates the best opportunities of application, and the expected results for each method.

KW - Chemometrics

KW - CHEMSIC

KW - Crude oil

KW - Diagnostic ratios

KW - Forensic

KW - Iguaçu River

KW - OSINET

KW - Petroleum biomarkers

KW - Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)

KW - Principal component analysis (PCA)

KW - Selected ion chromatograms (SICs)

KW - Weathering

U2 - 10.1016/B978-0-12-804434-6.00025-2

DO - 10.1016/B978-0-12-804434-6.00025-2

M3 - Book chapter

SN - 9780128044346

SP - 515

EP - 561

BT - Oil Spill Environmental Forensics Case Studies

PB - Elsevier

ER -

ID: 227437351