Yield prediction in spring barley from spectral reflectance and weather data using machine learning

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Yield prediction in spring barley from spectral reflectance and weather data using machine learning. / Petersen, Carsten T.; Langgaard, Mette Kramer; Petersen, Søren D.

In: Soil Use and Management, Vol. 39, No. 2, 2023, p. 975-987.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Petersen, CT, Langgaard, MK & Petersen, SD 2023, 'Yield prediction in spring barley from spectral reflectance and weather data using machine learning', Soil Use and Management, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 975-987. https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12902

APA

Petersen, C. T., Langgaard, M. K., & Petersen, S. D. (2023). Yield prediction in spring barley from spectral reflectance and weather data using machine learning. Soil Use and Management, 39(2), 975-987. https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12902

Vancouver

Petersen CT, Langgaard MK, Petersen SD. Yield prediction in spring barley from spectral reflectance and weather data using machine learning. Soil Use and Management. 2023;39(2):975-987. https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12902

Author

Petersen, Carsten T. ; Langgaard, Mette Kramer ; Petersen, Søren D. / Yield prediction in spring barley from spectral reflectance and weather data using machine learning. In: Soil Use and Management. 2023 ; Vol. 39, No. 2. pp. 975-987.

Bibtex

@article{281730b989c9450098e921ac9bdbe6cc,
title = "Yield prediction in spring barley from spectral reflectance and weather data using machine learning",
abstract = "Accurate preharvest yield estimation is an important issue for agricultural planning purposes and precision farming. Machine learning (ML) based on readily obtained information on the cropping system, typically including spectral reflectance measurements, is an essential approach for achieving practical solutions. We tested in a 9-year soil compaction experiment the accuracy of ML-based yield predictions made up to 2 months before harvest from a Ratio Vegetation Index (RVI) and recordings of precipitation and reference evapotranspiration. The applied data set comprises 224 combinations of plots and years with measured grain yields in the range of 4.22–9.34 Mg/ha. The best ML model [i.e., with the smallest mean absolute error (MAE)] was selected automatically by the AutoML interface included in the R program package H2O. Its cross-validated predictions made on June 30 more than 1 month before harvest showed an MAE of 0.38 Mg/ha when trained on all data from all years except the one under consideration. MAE increased to about 0.68 Mg/ha when determined 3 weeks earlier on June 10. MAE values in the range of 0.32–0.42 Mg/ha were obtained for predictions made on June 30 when based on data from at least six consecutive years; however, MAE showed no generally decreasing trend with the number of years. Yield estimations were robust towards a considerable soil variation observed within the experimental area due in part to the experimental treatments. The results show a potential of making yield predictions in barley 1–2 months before harvest, which, however, is not sufficiently early to support decisions on top-dress N fertilization.",
keywords = "AutoML, precision farming, remote sensing, RVI, yield forecasting",
author = "Petersen, {Carsten T.} and Langgaard, {Mette Kramer} and Petersen, {S{\o}ren D.}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023 The Authors. Soil Use and Management published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Society of Soil Science.",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1111/sum.12902",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "975--987",
journal = "Soil Use and Management",
issn = "0266-0032",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Yield prediction in spring barley from spectral reflectance and weather data using machine learning

AU - Petersen, Carsten T.

AU - Langgaard, Mette Kramer

AU - Petersen, Søren D.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023 The Authors. Soil Use and Management published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Society of Soil Science.

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - Accurate preharvest yield estimation is an important issue for agricultural planning purposes and precision farming. Machine learning (ML) based on readily obtained information on the cropping system, typically including spectral reflectance measurements, is an essential approach for achieving practical solutions. We tested in a 9-year soil compaction experiment the accuracy of ML-based yield predictions made up to 2 months before harvest from a Ratio Vegetation Index (RVI) and recordings of precipitation and reference evapotranspiration. The applied data set comprises 224 combinations of plots and years with measured grain yields in the range of 4.22–9.34 Mg/ha. The best ML model [i.e., with the smallest mean absolute error (MAE)] was selected automatically by the AutoML interface included in the R program package H2O. Its cross-validated predictions made on June 30 more than 1 month before harvest showed an MAE of 0.38 Mg/ha when trained on all data from all years except the one under consideration. MAE increased to about 0.68 Mg/ha when determined 3 weeks earlier on June 10. MAE values in the range of 0.32–0.42 Mg/ha were obtained for predictions made on June 30 when based on data from at least six consecutive years; however, MAE showed no generally decreasing trend with the number of years. Yield estimations were robust towards a considerable soil variation observed within the experimental area due in part to the experimental treatments. The results show a potential of making yield predictions in barley 1–2 months before harvest, which, however, is not sufficiently early to support decisions on top-dress N fertilization.

AB - Accurate preharvest yield estimation is an important issue for agricultural planning purposes and precision farming. Machine learning (ML) based on readily obtained information on the cropping system, typically including spectral reflectance measurements, is an essential approach for achieving practical solutions. We tested in a 9-year soil compaction experiment the accuracy of ML-based yield predictions made up to 2 months before harvest from a Ratio Vegetation Index (RVI) and recordings of precipitation and reference evapotranspiration. The applied data set comprises 224 combinations of plots and years with measured grain yields in the range of 4.22–9.34 Mg/ha. The best ML model [i.e., with the smallest mean absolute error (MAE)] was selected automatically by the AutoML interface included in the R program package H2O. Its cross-validated predictions made on June 30 more than 1 month before harvest showed an MAE of 0.38 Mg/ha when trained on all data from all years except the one under consideration. MAE increased to about 0.68 Mg/ha when determined 3 weeks earlier on June 10. MAE values in the range of 0.32–0.42 Mg/ha were obtained for predictions made on June 30 when based on data from at least six consecutive years; however, MAE showed no generally decreasing trend with the number of years. Yield estimations were robust towards a considerable soil variation observed within the experimental area due in part to the experimental treatments. The results show a potential of making yield predictions in barley 1–2 months before harvest, which, however, is not sufficiently early to support decisions on top-dress N fertilization.

KW - AutoML

KW - precision farming

KW - remote sensing

KW - RVI

KW - yield forecasting

U2 - 10.1111/sum.12902

DO - 10.1111/sum.12902

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85151419335

VL - 39

SP - 975

EP - 987

JO - Soil Use and Management

JF - Soil Use and Management

SN - 0266-0032

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 343357015