Assessment of the stabilization effect of ferrous sulfate for arsenic-contaminated soils based on chemical extraction methods and in vitro methods: Methodological differences and linkages
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Assessment of the stabilization effect of ferrous sulfate for arsenic-contaminated soils based on chemical extraction methods and in vitro methods : Methodological differences and linkages. / Geng, Ziqi; Wang, Pengfei; Yin, Naiyi; Cai, Xiaolin; Fu, Yaqi; Fan, Chuanfang; Chang, Xuhui; Li, Yunpeng; Ma, Jingnan; Cui, Yanshan; Holm, Peter E.
In: Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 925, 171729, 2024.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessment of the stabilization effect of ferrous sulfate for arsenic-contaminated soils based on chemical extraction methods and in vitro methods
T2 - Methodological differences and linkages
AU - Geng, Ziqi
AU - Wang, Pengfei
AU - Yin, Naiyi
AU - Cai, Xiaolin
AU - Fu, Yaqi
AU - Fan, Chuanfang
AU - Chang, Xuhui
AU - Li, Yunpeng
AU - Ma, Jingnan
AU - Cui, Yanshan
AU - Holm, Peter E.
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Stabilization of arsenic-contaminated soils with ferrous sulfate has been reported in many studies, but there are few stabilization effects assessments simultaneously combined chemical extraction methods and in vitro methods, and further explored the corresponding alternative relationships. In this study, ferrous sulfate was added at Fe[sbnd]As molar ratio of 0, 5, 10 and 20 to stabilize As in 10 As spiked soils. Stabilization effects were assessed by 6 chemical extraction methods (toxicity characteristic leaching procedures (TCLP), HCl, diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA), CaCl2, CH3COONH4, (NH4)2SO4), and 4 in vitro methods (physiologically based extraction test (PBET), in vitro gastrointestinal method (IVG), Solubility Bioaccessibility Research Consortium (SBRC) method, and the Unified Bioaccessibility Research Group of Europe method (UBM)). The results showed that the HCl method provides the most conservative assessment results in non-calcareous soils, and in alkaline calcareous soils, (NH4)2SO4 method provides a more conservative assessment. In vitro methods provided significantly higher As concentrations than chemical extraction methods. The components of the simulated digestion solution as well as the parameters may have contributed to this result. The small intestinal phase of PBET and SBRC method produced the highest and lowest ranges of As concentrations, and in the range of 127–462 mg/kg and 68–222 mg/kg when the Fe[sbnd]As molar ratio was 5. So the small intestinal phase of PBET method may provide the most conservative assessment results, while the same phase of SBRC may underestimate the human health risks of As in stabilized soil by 51 %(at a Fe[sbnd]As molar ratio of 5). Spearman correlation analysis indicated that the small intestinal phase of PBET method correlated best with HCl method (correlation coefficient: 0.71). This study provides ideas for the assessment of stabilization efforts to ensure that stabilization meets ecological needs while also being less harmful to humans.
AB - Stabilization of arsenic-contaminated soils with ferrous sulfate has been reported in many studies, but there are few stabilization effects assessments simultaneously combined chemical extraction methods and in vitro methods, and further explored the corresponding alternative relationships. In this study, ferrous sulfate was added at Fe[sbnd]As molar ratio of 0, 5, 10 and 20 to stabilize As in 10 As spiked soils. Stabilization effects were assessed by 6 chemical extraction methods (toxicity characteristic leaching procedures (TCLP), HCl, diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA), CaCl2, CH3COONH4, (NH4)2SO4), and 4 in vitro methods (physiologically based extraction test (PBET), in vitro gastrointestinal method (IVG), Solubility Bioaccessibility Research Consortium (SBRC) method, and the Unified Bioaccessibility Research Group of Europe method (UBM)). The results showed that the HCl method provides the most conservative assessment results in non-calcareous soils, and in alkaline calcareous soils, (NH4)2SO4 method provides a more conservative assessment. In vitro methods provided significantly higher As concentrations than chemical extraction methods. The components of the simulated digestion solution as well as the parameters may have contributed to this result. The small intestinal phase of PBET and SBRC method produced the highest and lowest ranges of As concentrations, and in the range of 127–462 mg/kg and 68–222 mg/kg when the Fe[sbnd]As molar ratio was 5. So the small intestinal phase of PBET method may provide the most conservative assessment results, while the same phase of SBRC may underestimate the human health risks of As in stabilized soil by 51 %(at a Fe[sbnd]As molar ratio of 5). Spearman correlation analysis indicated that the small intestinal phase of PBET method correlated best with HCl method (correlation coefficient: 0.71). This study provides ideas for the assessment of stabilization efforts to ensure that stabilization meets ecological needs while also being less harmful to humans.
KW - Arsenic contamination
KW - Chemical extraction methods
KW - Ferrous sulfate
KW - In vitro methods
KW - Stabilization effect
U2 - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171729
DO - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171729
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 38492589
AN - SCOPUS:85188070665
VL - 925
JO - Science of the Total Environment
JF - Science of the Total Environment
SN - 0048-9697
M1 - 171729
ER -
ID: 390188088