Life cycle assessment of struvite recovery and wastewater sludge end-use: A Flemish illustration

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Life cycle assessment of struvite recovery and wastewater sludge end-use : A Flemish illustration. / Ravi, Rahul; Beyers, Miriam; Bruun, Sander; Meers, Erik.

I: Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Bind 182, 106325, 2022.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Ravi, R, Beyers, M, Bruun, S & Meers, E 2022, 'Life cycle assessment of struvite recovery and wastewater sludge end-use: A Flemish illustration', Resources, Conservation and Recycling, bind 182, 106325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106325

APA

Ravi, R., Beyers, M., Bruun, S., & Meers, E. (2022). Life cycle assessment of struvite recovery and wastewater sludge end-use: A Flemish illustration. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 182, [106325]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106325

Vancouver

Ravi R, Beyers M, Bruun S, Meers E. Life cycle assessment of struvite recovery and wastewater sludge end-use: A Flemish illustration. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2022;182. 106325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106325

Author

Ravi, Rahul ; Beyers, Miriam ; Bruun, Sander ; Meers, Erik. / Life cycle assessment of struvite recovery and wastewater sludge end-use : A Flemish illustration. I: Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2022 ; Bind 182.

Bibtex

@article{6de3f1a92b3c403abc1bd7b7dcd044d7,
title = "Life cycle assessment of struvite recovery and wastewater sludge end-use: A Flemish illustration",
abstract = "Phosphate rock (PR) has been designated as a Critical Raw Material in the European Union (EU). This has led to increased emphasis on alternative P recovery (APR) from secondary streams like wastewater sludge (WWS). However, WWS end-use is a contentious topic, and EU member states prefer different end-use pathways (land application/incineration/valorisation in cement kilns). Previous Life Cycle Assessments (LCA) on APRs from WWS reached contrasting conclusions; while most considered WWS as waste and highlighted a net benefit relative to PR mining and beneficiation, others viewed WWS as a resource and highlighted a net burden of the treatment. We used a combined functional unit (that views WWS from a waste as well as a resource perspective) and applied it on a Flemish wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) with struvite recovery as APR technology. Firstly, a retrospective comparison was performed to measure the WWTP performance before and after struvite recovery and the analysis was complemented by uncertainty and global sensitivity analyses. The results showed struvite recovery provides marginal environmental benefits due to improved WWS dewatering and reduced polymer use. Secondly, a prospective LCA approach was performed to reflect policy changes regarding WWS end-use options in Flanders. Results indicated complete mono-incineration of WWS, ash processing to recover P and the subsequent land application appears to be less sustainable in terms of climate change, human toxicity, and terrestrial acidification relative to the status quo, i.e., co-incineration with municipal solid waste and valorisation at cement kilns. Impacts on fossil depletion, however, favour mono-incineration over the status quo.",
keywords = "LCA, Phosphorus recovery, Prospective LCA, Global sensitivity analysis, Wastewater sludge treatment",
author = "Rahul Ravi and Miriam Beyers and Sander Bruun and Erik Meers",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106325",
language = "English",
volume = "182",
journal = "Resources, Conservation and Recycling",
issn = "0921-3449",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Life cycle assessment of struvite recovery and wastewater sludge end-use

T2 - A Flemish illustration

AU - Ravi, Rahul

AU - Beyers, Miriam

AU - Bruun, Sander

AU - Meers, Erik

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Phosphate rock (PR) has been designated as a Critical Raw Material in the European Union (EU). This has led to increased emphasis on alternative P recovery (APR) from secondary streams like wastewater sludge (WWS). However, WWS end-use is a contentious topic, and EU member states prefer different end-use pathways (land application/incineration/valorisation in cement kilns). Previous Life Cycle Assessments (LCA) on APRs from WWS reached contrasting conclusions; while most considered WWS as waste and highlighted a net benefit relative to PR mining and beneficiation, others viewed WWS as a resource and highlighted a net burden of the treatment. We used a combined functional unit (that views WWS from a waste as well as a resource perspective) and applied it on a Flemish wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) with struvite recovery as APR technology. Firstly, a retrospective comparison was performed to measure the WWTP performance before and after struvite recovery and the analysis was complemented by uncertainty and global sensitivity analyses. The results showed struvite recovery provides marginal environmental benefits due to improved WWS dewatering and reduced polymer use. Secondly, a prospective LCA approach was performed to reflect policy changes regarding WWS end-use options in Flanders. Results indicated complete mono-incineration of WWS, ash processing to recover P and the subsequent land application appears to be less sustainable in terms of climate change, human toxicity, and terrestrial acidification relative to the status quo, i.e., co-incineration with municipal solid waste and valorisation at cement kilns. Impacts on fossil depletion, however, favour mono-incineration over the status quo.

AB - Phosphate rock (PR) has been designated as a Critical Raw Material in the European Union (EU). This has led to increased emphasis on alternative P recovery (APR) from secondary streams like wastewater sludge (WWS). However, WWS end-use is a contentious topic, and EU member states prefer different end-use pathways (land application/incineration/valorisation in cement kilns). Previous Life Cycle Assessments (LCA) on APRs from WWS reached contrasting conclusions; while most considered WWS as waste and highlighted a net benefit relative to PR mining and beneficiation, others viewed WWS as a resource and highlighted a net burden of the treatment. We used a combined functional unit (that views WWS from a waste as well as a resource perspective) and applied it on a Flemish wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) with struvite recovery as APR technology. Firstly, a retrospective comparison was performed to measure the WWTP performance before and after struvite recovery and the analysis was complemented by uncertainty and global sensitivity analyses. The results showed struvite recovery provides marginal environmental benefits due to improved WWS dewatering and reduced polymer use. Secondly, a prospective LCA approach was performed to reflect policy changes regarding WWS end-use options in Flanders. Results indicated complete mono-incineration of WWS, ash processing to recover P and the subsequent land application appears to be less sustainable in terms of climate change, human toxicity, and terrestrial acidification relative to the status quo, i.e., co-incineration with municipal solid waste and valorisation at cement kilns. Impacts on fossil depletion, however, favour mono-incineration over the status quo.

KW - LCA

KW - Phosphorus recovery

KW - Prospective LCA, Global sensitivity analysis

KW - Wastewater sludge treatment

U2 - 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106325

DO - 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106325

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 35782309

AN - SCOPUS:85129387558

VL - 182

JO - Resources, Conservation and Recycling

JF - Resources, Conservation and Recycling

SN - 0921-3449

M1 - 106325

ER -

ID: 310964016