Why are there so few examples of entomopathogenic fungi that manipulate host sexual behaviors?

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

Why are there so few examples of entomopathogenic fungi that manipulate host sexual behaviors? / Hansen, Andreas N.; De Fine Licht, Henrik H.

In: Fungal Ecology, Vol. 38, 04.2019, p. 21-27.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Hansen, AN & De Fine Licht, HH 2019, 'Why are there so few examples of entomopathogenic fungi that manipulate host sexual behaviors?', Fungal Ecology, vol. 38, pp. 21-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funeco.2018.09.004

APA

Hansen, A. N., & De Fine Licht, H. H. (2019). Why are there so few examples of entomopathogenic fungi that manipulate host sexual behaviors? Fungal Ecology, 38, 21-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funeco.2018.09.004

Vancouver

Hansen AN, De Fine Licht HH. Why are there so few examples of entomopathogenic fungi that manipulate host sexual behaviors? Fungal Ecology. 2019 Apr;38:21-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funeco.2018.09.004

Author

Hansen, Andreas N. ; De Fine Licht, Henrik H. / Why are there so few examples of entomopathogenic fungi that manipulate host sexual behaviors?. In: Fungal Ecology. 2019 ; Vol. 38. pp. 21-27.

Bibtex

@article{878fffd303d34758978e3aa9007f25d4,
title = "Why are there so few examples of entomopathogenic fungi that manipulate host sexual behaviors?",
abstract = "For entomopathogenic fungi (EPF), it may be particularly advantageous to manipulate host behavior in order to increase conspecific encounters that facilitate transmission of conidia. To achieve this, some EPF apparently alter the chemical communication and signaling of insect sexual behavior, but there are very few documented examples. Here, we identify and discuss the few known examples and propose two categories of EPF-induced alterations in insect sexual behavior. First, EPF may induce changes in how healthy conspecifics of the opposite sex perceive and respond to the infected individual via chemical or visual cues, which promote the display of sexual behaviors towards the infected individual. Second, EPF may directly change sexual behavior of the infected individual to promote conspecific encounters. We conclude that the scarcity of observed examples is likely caused by the difficulty of detecting subtle changes in insect sexual behavior, but also because manipulation of host sexual behavior is a trait primarily present in understudied host-specific EPF.",
keywords = "Cuticular hydrocarbons, Entomopathogenic fungi, Host manipulation, Host-pathogen interactions, Insect behavior, Insect pathogens, Pheromones",
author = "Hansen, {Andreas N.} and {De Fine Licht}, {Henrik H.}",
year = "2019",
month = apr,
doi = "10.1016/j.funeco.2018.09.004",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "21--27",
journal = "Fungal Ecology",
issn = "1754-5048",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why are there so few examples of entomopathogenic fungi that manipulate host sexual behaviors?

AU - Hansen, Andreas N.

AU - De Fine Licht, Henrik H.

PY - 2019/4

Y1 - 2019/4

N2 - For entomopathogenic fungi (EPF), it may be particularly advantageous to manipulate host behavior in order to increase conspecific encounters that facilitate transmission of conidia. To achieve this, some EPF apparently alter the chemical communication and signaling of insect sexual behavior, but there are very few documented examples. Here, we identify and discuss the few known examples and propose two categories of EPF-induced alterations in insect sexual behavior. First, EPF may induce changes in how healthy conspecifics of the opposite sex perceive and respond to the infected individual via chemical or visual cues, which promote the display of sexual behaviors towards the infected individual. Second, EPF may directly change sexual behavior of the infected individual to promote conspecific encounters. We conclude that the scarcity of observed examples is likely caused by the difficulty of detecting subtle changes in insect sexual behavior, but also because manipulation of host sexual behavior is a trait primarily present in understudied host-specific EPF.

AB - For entomopathogenic fungi (EPF), it may be particularly advantageous to manipulate host behavior in order to increase conspecific encounters that facilitate transmission of conidia. To achieve this, some EPF apparently alter the chemical communication and signaling of insect sexual behavior, but there are very few documented examples. Here, we identify and discuss the few known examples and propose two categories of EPF-induced alterations in insect sexual behavior. First, EPF may induce changes in how healthy conspecifics of the opposite sex perceive and respond to the infected individual via chemical or visual cues, which promote the display of sexual behaviors towards the infected individual. Second, EPF may directly change sexual behavior of the infected individual to promote conspecific encounters. We conclude that the scarcity of observed examples is likely caused by the difficulty of detecting subtle changes in insect sexual behavior, but also because manipulation of host sexual behavior is a trait primarily present in understudied host-specific EPF.

KW - Cuticular hydrocarbons

KW - Entomopathogenic fungi

KW - Host manipulation

KW - Host-pathogen interactions

KW - Insect behavior

KW - Insect pathogens

KW - Pheromones

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053869159&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.funeco.2018.09.004

DO - 10.1016/j.funeco.2018.09.004

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85053869159

VL - 38

SP - 21

EP - 27

JO - Fungal Ecology

JF - Fungal Ecology

SN - 1754-5048

ER -

ID: 213626278