Nonlinear mixed-model regression to analyze herbicide dose-response relationships

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Nonlinear mixed-model regression to analyze herbicide dose-response relationships. / Nielsen, O K; Ritz, Christian; Streibig, Jens Carl.

In: Weed Technology, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2004, p. 30-37.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Nielsen, OK, Ritz, C & Streibig, JC 2004, 'Nonlinear mixed-model regression to analyze herbicide dose-response relationships', Weed Technology, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 30-37. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-03-070R1

APA

Nielsen, O. K., Ritz, C., & Streibig, J. C. (2004). Nonlinear mixed-model regression to analyze herbicide dose-response relationships. Weed Technology, 18(1), 30-37. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-03-070R1

Vancouver

Nielsen OK, Ritz C, Streibig JC. Nonlinear mixed-model regression to analyze herbicide dose-response relationships. Weed Technology. 2004;18(1):30-37. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-03-070R1

Author

Nielsen, O K ; Ritz, Christian ; Streibig, Jens Carl. / Nonlinear mixed-model regression to analyze herbicide dose-response relationships. In: Weed Technology. 2004 ; Vol. 18, No. 1. pp. 30-37.

Bibtex

@article{fdc81e055cdd44c8983712583ccb70c1,
title = "Nonlinear mixed-model regression to analyze herbicide dose-response relationships",
abstract = "Plant responses to various doses of herbicides usually follow a sigmoid model where the potency is given by the 50% inhibition (I50) value. To assess the potency of a herbicide under a range of environmental conditions, a series of independent bioassays are necessary to account for assay-to-assay variation. Analysis has conventionally been done by separate analysis of the individual bioassays or by simply pooling data. Analyzing the individual bioassays separately throws up relevant information on interassay variation. Such a model becomes too complex because a full set of model parameters is needed for each data set. Pooling data instead, and analyzing the bioassay jointly, inflates parameter uncertainty because of oversimplification. Such a simple model would have too few variables, and the fixed-effect estimates would be more uncertain because they would be explaining the interassay random effects. This means that the underlying statistical model is not realistic. Therefore, we propose a new technique of intermediate complexity that outperforms either technique and provides biologically realistic estimates that allow us to compare herbicide potencies. With this technique, we simultaneously analyze independent experiments by using a combination of nonlinear regression and mixed models. The case study uses a group of independently run bioassays with two photosystem II-inhibiting herbicides, diuron and bentazon, by measuring the oxygen evolution of thylakoid membranes. The introduction of random elements in the nonlinear regression parameters reduces the uncertainty in the parameters of interest. We demonstrate that it is possible to pool data from independent experiments to assess which parameters can be assigned a random element, to conduct hypothesis testing, and to calculate stable confidence limits and thus obtain a more precise interpretation of the biologically relevant parameters, such as I50, compared with the conventional nonlinear regression models of the individual bioassays. Nomenclature: Bentazon; diuron.",
keywords = "Bioassay, Log-logistic analysis, Maximum likelihood",
author = "Nielsen, {O K} and Christian Ritz and Streibig, {Jens Carl}",
year = "2004",
doi = "10.1614/WT-03-070R1",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "30--37",
journal = "Weed Technology",
issn = "0890-037X",
publisher = "Allen Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nonlinear mixed-model regression to analyze herbicide dose-response relationships

AU - Nielsen, O K

AU - Ritz, Christian

AU - Streibig, Jens Carl

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - Plant responses to various doses of herbicides usually follow a sigmoid model where the potency is given by the 50% inhibition (I50) value. To assess the potency of a herbicide under a range of environmental conditions, a series of independent bioassays are necessary to account for assay-to-assay variation. Analysis has conventionally been done by separate analysis of the individual bioassays or by simply pooling data. Analyzing the individual bioassays separately throws up relevant information on interassay variation. Such a model becomes too complex because a full set of model parameters is needed for each data set. Pooling data instead, and analyzing the bioassay jointly, inflates parameter uncertainty because of oversimplification. Such a simple model would have too few variables, and the fixed-effect estimates would be more uncertain because they would be explaining the interassay random effects. This means that the underlying statistical model is not realistic. Therefore, we propose a new technique of intermediate complexity that outperforms either technique and provides biologically realistic estimates that allow us to compare herbicide potencies. With this technique, we simultaneously analyze independent experiments by using a combination of nonlinear regression and mixed models. The case study uses a group of independently run bioassays with two photosystem II-inhibiting herbicides, diuron and bentazon, by measuring the oxygen evolution of thylakoid membranes. The introduction of random elements in the nonlinear regression parameters reduces the uncertainty in the parameters of interest. We demonstrate that it is possible to pool data from independent experiments to assess which parameters can be assigned a random element, to conduct hypothesis testing, and to calculate stable confidence limits and thus obtain a more precise interpretation of the biologically relevant parameters, such as I50, compared with the conventional nonlinear regression models of the individual bioassays. Nomenclature: Bentazon; diuron.

AB - Plant responses to various doses of herbicides usually follow a sigmoid model where the potency is given by the 50% inhibition (I50) value. To assess the potency of a herbicide under a range of environmental conditions, a series of independent bioassays are necessary to account for assay-to-assay variation. Analysis has conventionally been done by separate analysis of the individual bioassays or by simply pooling data. Analyzing the individual bioassays separately throws up relevant information on interassay variation. Such a model becomes too complex because a full set of model parameters is needed for each data set. Pooling data instead, and analyzing the bioassay jointly, inflates parameter uncertainty because of oversimplification. Such a simple model would have too few variables, and the fixed-effect estimates would be more uncertain because they would be explaining the interassay random effects. This means that the underlying statistical model is not realistic. Therefore, we propose a new technique of intermediate complexity that outperforms either technique and provides biologically realistic estimates that allow us to compare herbicide potencies. With this technique, we simultaneously analyze independent experiments by using a combination of nonlinear regression and mixed models. The case study uses a group of independently run bioassays with two photosystem II-inhibiting herbicides, diuron and bentazon, by measuring the oxygen evolution of thylakoid membranes. The introduction of random elements in the nonlinear regression parameters reduces the uncertainty in the parameters of interest. We demonstrate that it is possible to pool data from independent experiments to assess which parameters can be assigned a random element, to conduct hypothesis testing, and to calculate stable confidence limits and thus obtain a more precise interpretation of the biologically relevant parameters, such as I50, compared with the conventional nonlinear regression models of the individual bioassays. Nomenclature: Bentazon; diuron.

KW - Bioassay

KW - Log-logistic analysis

KW - Maximum likelihood

U2 - 10.1614/WT-03-070R1

DO - 10.1614/WT-03-070R1

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:33748065392

VL - 18

SP - 30

EP - 37

JO - Weed Technology

JF - Weed Technology

SN - 0890-037X

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 211949398