Can alternative N-fertilization methods influence GHG emissions and biomass production in sugarcane fields?

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  • Clovis D. Borges
  • João Luís N. Carvalho
  • Oriel T. Kölln
  • Guilherme M. Sanches
  • Marcelo J. Silva
  • Sergio G.Q. Castro
  • Quassi de Castro, Saulo Augusto
  • Luara L. Sousa
  • Juliana V.C. Oliveira
  • Heitor Cantarella
  • Vitor P. Vargas
  • Siu M. Tsai
  • Henrique C.J. Franco

This study evaluated the effect of different N fertilizer application methods on N2O and CH4 emissions and on sugarcane biomass yields over two successive growing seasons. Treatments included three methods of N fertilizer (120 kg ha−1 N) application: 1) above the straw layer; 2) below the straw layer; 3) incorporated into the soil (at 0.1-m soil depth) below the straw layer; and 4) no N application (control). Sugarcane yield for the above straw treatment was, on average, 12% and 15% lower than below the straw and incorporated into the soil, respectively. Emissions of CH4 were very low and unaffected by N fertilizer placement. The method and timing of N application influenced N2O emissions. For both years, higher N2O emissions were observed from the above straw, followed by below straw and incorporated treatments. Except for the above straw treatment during the wet season, the N2O emission factors ranged from 0.08 to 0.62 and were lower than the IPCC default value (1%). The intensity of N2O emissions was, on average, 7.45, 3.97 and 3.3 kg CO2eq Mg stalk−1 for N applied above straw, below straw and incorporated into the soil, respectively. Changes in the N fertilizer placement method and on the timing of application can significantly reduce GHG emissions during sugarcane production, making a significant contribution toward a cleaner production of sugarcane ethanol.

Original languageEnglish
JournalBiomass and Bioenergy
Volume120
Pages (from-to)21-27
Number of pages7
ISSN0961-9534
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2019
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This research was supported by the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP - 2015/23186-8 and 2015/21893-9 ). We are grateful for the financial support of the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq - 449656/2014-4 and 150780/2015-0 ). We also thank the Iracema Mill who permitted use of the study area and provided logistical support during the field work. We are grateful to Laura K Meredith for critical review and constructive comments on a previous draft of this manuscript.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Ltd

    Research areas

  • Bioethanol, Nitrogen cycle, Nitrous oxide emissions, Saccharum spp., Sugarcane straw

ID: 327389973