A Comparison of Cellulose Nanocrystals and Nanofibers as Reinforcements to Amylose-Based Composite Bioplastics

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

A Comparison of Cellulose Nanocrystals and Nanofibers as Reinforcements to Amylose-Based Composite Bioplastics. / Faisal, Marwa; Žmirić, Marija; Kim, Ngoc Quynh Nhu; Bruun, Sander; Mariniello, Loredana; Famiglietti, Michela; Bordallo, Heloisa N.; Kirkensgaard, Jacob Judas Kain; Jørgensen, Bodil; Ulvskov, Peter; Hebelstrup, Kim Henrik; Blennow, Andreas.

I: Coatings, Bind 13, Nr. 9, 1573, 2023.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Faisal, M, Žmirić, M, Kim, NQN, Bruun, S, Mariniello, L, Famiglietti, M, Bordallo, HN, Kirkensgaard, JJK, Jørgensen, B, Ulvskov, P, Hebelstrup, KH & Blennow, A 2023, 'A Comparison of Cellulose Nanocrystals and Nanofibers as Reinforcements to Amylose-Based Composite Bioplastics', Coatings, bind 13, nr. 9, 1573. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13091573

APA

Faisal, M., Žmirić, M., Kim, N. Q. N., Bruun, S., Mariniello, L., Famiglietti, M., Bordallo, H. N., Kirkensgaard, J. J. K., Jørgensen, B., Ulvskov, P., Hebelstrup, K. H., & Blennow, A. (2023). A Comparison of Cellulose Nanocrystals and Nanofibers as Reinforcements to Amylose-Based Composite Bioplastics. Coatings, 13(9), [1573]. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13091573

Vancouver

Faisal M, Žmirić M, Kim NQN, Bruun S, Mariniello L, Famiglietti M o.a. A Comparison of Cellulose Nanocrystals and Nanofibers as Reinforcements to Amylose-Based Composite Bioplastics. Coatings. 2023;13(9). 1573. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13091573

Author

Faisal, Marwa ; Žmirić, Marija ; Kim, Ngoc Quynh Nhu ; Bruun, Sander ; Mariniello, Loredana ; Famiglietti, Michela ; Bordallo, Heloisa N. ; Kirkensgaard, Jacob Judas Kain ; Jørgensen, Bodil ; Ulvskov, Peter ; Hebelstrup, Kim Henrik ; Blennow, Andreas. / A Comparison of Cellulose Nanocrystals and Nanofibers as Reinforcements to Amylose-Based Composite Bioplastics. I: Coatings. 2023 ; Bind 13, Nr. 9.

Bibtex

@article{34f1682db9fc4a6a8a74c07ffb64689f,
title = "A Comparison of Cellulose Nanocrystals and Nanofibers as Reinforcements to Amylose-Based Composite Bioplastics",
abstract = "Starch-based bioplastics offer a promising alternative to conventional plastics. However, they exhibit certain limitations, notably in terms of mechanical strength and barrier properties. These challenges could potentially be addressed through the incorporation of nanocellulose as a reinforcing agent. In this study, we fabricated bioplastic films using a casting and blending approach, employing highly linear pure amylose (AM) in combination with cellulose nanofibers (CNF) or cellulose nanocrystals (CNC) at various ratios. This allowed for a direct comparison of CNF and CNC functionality within the AM matrix. We systematically assessed mechanical properties and water barrier characteristics, encompassing parameters such as water permeability, moisture content, swelling, solubility, crystallinity, thermal stability, transmittance, and opacity. Additionally, we investigated water vapor and oxygen permeability. Furthermore, we delved into distinctions between CNC and CNF biocomposites. Incorporation of either type of nanocellulose yielded enhancements in film properties, with CNF exerting a more pronounced positive influence compared to CNC. Particularly noteworthy were the mechanical properties, wherein CNF composite films demonstrated markedly higher tensile strength and Young{\textquoteright}s modulus compared to their CNC counterparts. For instance, the inclusion of 1% CNF led to a substantial increase in AM tensile strength from 66.1 MPa to 144.8 MPa. Conversely, water vapor permeability exhibited a converse behavior, as the addition of 1% CNF resulted in a significant reduction of water barrier properties from 8.7 to 1.32 g mm m−2 24 h−1kPa−1. Intriguingly, CNC films displayed greater elongation at the point of rupture in comparison to CNF films. This can be attributed to the larger surface area of the CNC and the favorable interfacial interaction between AM and CNC. Notably, the introduction of nanocellulose led to reduced film opacity and improved thermal stability. In summary, nanocellulose interacted synergistically with the AM matrix, establishing a robust hydrogen-bonded network that greatly enhanced the performance of the biocomposite films.",
keywords = "amylose, biocomposites, bioplastics, food packaging, nanocellulose, nanocellulose crystal, nanocellulose fibers, novel material",
author = "Marwa Faisal and Marija {\v Z}miri{\'c} and Kim, {Ngoc Quynh Nhu} and Sander Bruun and Loredana Mariniello and Michela Famiglietti and Bordallo, {Heloisa N.} and Kirkensgaard, {Jacob Judas Kain} and Bodil J{\o}rgensen and Peter Ulvskov and Hebelstrup, {Kim Henrik} and Andreas Blennow",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023 by the authors.",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.3390/coatings13091573",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
journal = "Coatings",
issn = "2079-6412",
publisher = "MDPI AG",
number = "9",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Comparison of Cellulose Nanocrystals and Nanofibers as Reinforcements to Amylose-Based Composite Bioplastics

AU - Faisal, Marwa

AU - Žmirić, Marija

AU - Kim, Ngoc Quynh Nhu

AU - Bruun, Sander

AU - Mariniello, Loredana

AU - Famiglietti, Michela

AU - Bordallo, Heloisa N.

AU - Kirkensgaard, Jacob Judas Kain

AU - Jørgensen, Bodil

AU - Ulvskov, Peter

AU - Hebelstrup, Kim Henrik

AU - Blennow, Andreas

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023 by the authors.

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - Starch-based bioplastics offer a promising alternative to conventional plastics. However, they exhibit certain limitations, notably in terms of mechanical strength and barrier properties. These challenges could potentially be addressed through the incorporation of nanocellulose as a reinforcing agent. In this study, we fabricated bioplastic films using a casting and blending approach, employing highly linear pure amylose (AM) in combination with cellulose nanofibers (CNF) or cellulose nanocrystals (CNC) at various ratios. This allowed for a direct comparison of CNF and CNC functionality within the AM matrix. We systematically assessed mechanical properties and water barrier characteristics, encompassing parameters such as water permeability, moisture content, swelling, solubility, crystallinity, thermal stability, transmittance, and opacity. Additionally, we investigated water vapor and oxygen permeability. Furthermore, we delved into distinctions between CNC and CNF biocomposites. Incorporation of either type of nanocellulose yielded enhancements in film properties, with CNF exerting a more pronounced positive influence compared to CNC. Particularly noteworthy were the mechanical properties, wherein CNF composite films demonstrated markedly higher tensile strength and Young’s modulus compared to their CNC counterparts. For instance, the inclusion of 1% CNF led to a substantial increase in AM tensile strength from 66.1 MPa to 144.8 MPa. Conversely, water vapor permeability exhibited a converse behavior, as the addition of 1% CNF resulted in a significant reduction of water barrier properties from 8.7 to 1.32 g mm m−2 24 h−1kPa−1. Intriguingly, CNC films displayed greater elongation at the point of rupture in comparison to CNF films. This can be attributed to the larger surface area of the CNC and the favorable interfacial interaction between AM and CNC. Notably, the introduction of nanocellulose led to reduced film opacity and improved thermal stability. In summary, nanocellulose interacted synergistically with the AM matrix, establishing a robust hydrogen-bonded network that greatly enhanced the performance of the biocomposite films.

AB - Starch-based bioplastics offer a promising alternative to conventional plastics. However, they exhibit certain limitations, notably in terms of mechanical strength and barrier properties. These challenges could potentially be addressed through the incorporation of nanocellulose as a reinforcing agent. In this study, we fabricated bioplastic films using a casting and blending approach, employing highly linear pure amylose (AM) in combination with cellulose nanofibers (CNF) or cellulose nanocrystals (CNC) at various ratios. This allowed for a direct comparison of CNF and CNC functionality within the AM matrix. We systematically assessed mechanical properties and water barrier characteristics, encompassing parameters such as water permeability, moisture content, swelling, solubility, crystallinity, thermal stability, transmittance, and opacity. Additionally, we investigated water vapor and oxygen permeability. Furthermore, we delved into distinctions between CNC and CNF biocomposites. Incorporation of either type of nanocellulose yielded enhancements in film properties, with CNF exerting a more pronounced positive influence compared to CNC. Particularly noteworthy were the mechanical properties, wherein CNF composite films demonstrated markedly higher tensile strength and Young’s modulus compared to their CNC counterparts. For instance, the inclusion of 1% CNF led to a substantial increase in AM tensile strength from 66.1 MPa to 144.8 MPa. Conversely, water vapor permeability exhibited a converse behavior, as the addition of 1% CNF resulted in a significant reduction of water barrier properties from 8.7 to 1.32 g mm m−2 24 h−1kPa−1. Intriguingly, CNC films displayed greater elongation at the point of rupture in comparison to CNF films. This can be attributed to the larger surface area of the CNC and the favorable interfacial interaction between AM and CNC. Notably, the introduction of nanocellulose led to reduced film opacity and improved thermal stability. In summary, nanocellulose interacted synergistically with the AM matrix, establishing a robust hydrogen-bonded network that greatly enhanced the performance of the biocomposite films.

KW - amylose

KW - biocomposites

KW - bioplastics

KW - food packaging

KW - nanocellulose

KW - nanocellulose crystal

KW - nanocellulose fibers

KW - novel material

U2 - 10.3390/coatings13091573

DO - 10.3390/coatings13091573

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85172778488

VL - 13

JO - Coatings

JF - Coatings

SN - 2079-6412

IS - 9

M1 - 1573

ER -

ID: 369356363