Biorefining in the prevailing energy and materials crisis: A review of sustainable pathways for biorefinery value chains and sustainability assessment methodologies

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Biorefining in the prevailing energy and materials crisis : A review of sustainable pathways for biorefinery value chains and sustainability assessment methodologies. / Parajuli, Ranjan; Dalgaard, Tommy; Jørgensen, Uffe; Adamsen, Anders Peter S.; Knudsen, Marie Trydeman; Birkved, Morten; Gylling, Morten; Schjørring, Jan Kofod.

In: Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 43, 2015, p. 244-263.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Parajuli, R, Dalgaard, T, Jørgensen, U, Adamsen, APS, Knudsen, MT, Birkved, M, Gylling, M & Schjørring, JK 2015, 'Biorefining in the prevailing energy and materials crisis: A review of sustainable pathways for biorefinery value chains and sustainability assessment methodologies', Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 43, pp. 244-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.11.041

APA

Parajuli, R., Dalgaard, T., Jørgensen, U., Adamsen, A. P. S., Knudsen, M. T., Birkved, M., Gylling, M., & Schjørring, J. K. (2015). Biorefining in the prevailing energy and materials crisis: A review of sustainable pathways for biorefinery value chains and sustainability assessment methodologies. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 43, 244-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.11.041

Vancouver

Parajuli R, Dalgaard T, Jørgensen U, Adamsen APS, Knudsen MT, Birkved M et al. Biorefining in the prevailing energy and materials crisis: A review of sustainable pathways for biorefinery value chains and sustainability assessment methodologies. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2015;43:244-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.11.041

Author

Parajuli, Ranjan ; Dalgaard, Tommy ; Jørgensen, Uffe ; Adamsen, Anders Peter S. ; Knudsen, Marie Trydeman ; Birkved, Morten ; Gylling, Morten ; Schjørring, Jan Kofod. / Biorefining in the prevailing energy and materials crisis : A review of sustainable pathways for biorefinery value chains and sustainability assessment methodologies. In: Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2015 ; Vol. 43. pp. 244-263.

Bibtex

@article{aaefdc0633714c9e9ad40d94adf320b7,
title = "Biorefining in the prevailing energy and materials crisis: A review of sustainable pathways for biorefinery value chains and sustainability assessment methodologies",
abstract = "The aim of the current paper is to discuss the sustainability aspect of biorefinery systems with focus on biomass supply chains, processing of biomass feedstocks in biorefinery platforms and sustainability assessment methodologies. From the stand point of sustainability, it is important to optimize the agricultural production system and minimize the related environmental impacts at the farming system level. These impacts are primarily related to agri-chemical inputs and the related undesired environmental emissions and to the repercussions from biomass production. At the same time, the biorefineries need a year-round supply of biomass and about 40-60% of the total operating cost of a typical biore finery is related to the feedstocks chosen, and thus highlights on the careful prioritization of feedstocks mainly based on their economic and environmental loadings. Regarding the processing in biorefinery platforms, chemical composition of biomasses is important. Biomasses with higher concentrations of cellulose and hemicelluloses compared to lignin are preferred for bioethanol production in the lignocellulosic biorefinery, since the biodegradability of cellulose is higher than lignin. A green biorefinery platform enables the extraction of protein from grasses, producing an important alternative to importing protein sources for food products and animal feed, while also allowing processing of residues to deliver bioethanol. Currently, there are several approaches to integrate biorefinery platforms, which are aimed to enhance their economic and environmental sustainability. Regarding sustainability assessment, the complexities related to the material flows in a biorefinery and the delivery of alternative biobased products means dealing with multiple indicators in the decision-making process to enable comparisons of alternatives. Life Cycle Assessment is regarded as one of the most relevant tools to assess the environmental hotspots in the biomass supply chains, at processing stages and also to support in the prioritization of any specific biobased products and the alternatives delivered from biorefineries.",
keywords = "Biobased product, Biomass feedstock, Biorefinery, Economic performances, Environmental performances, Life cycle assessment, Sustainability",
author = "Ranjan Parajuli and Tommy Dalgaard and Uffe J{\o}rgensen and Adamsen, {Anders Peter S.} and Knudsen, {Marie Trydeman} and Morten Birkved and Morten Gylling and Schj{\o}rring, {Jan Kofod}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1016/j.rser.2014.11.041",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "244--263",
journal = "Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews",
issn = "1364-0321",
publisher = "Pergamon Press",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biorefining in the prevailing energy and materials crisis

T2 - A review of sustainable pathways for biorefinery value chains and sustainability assessment methodologies

AU - Parajuli, Ranjan

AU - Dalgaard, Tommy

AU - Jørgensen, Uffe

AU - Adamsen, Anders Peter S.

AU - Knudsen, Marie Trydeman

AU - Birkved, Morten

AU - Gylling, Morten

AU - Schjørring, Jan Kofod

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - The aim of the current paper is to discuss the sustainability aspect of biorefinery systems with focus on biomass supply chains, processing of biomass feedstocks in biorefinery platforms and sustainability assessment methodologies. From the stand point of sustainability, it is important to optimize the agricultural production system and minimize the related environmental impacts at the farming system level. These impacts are primarily related to agri-chemical inputs and the related undesired environmental emissions and to the repercussions from biomass production. At the same time, the biorefineries need a year-round supply of biomass and about 40-60% of the total operating cost of a typical biore finery is related to the feedstocks chosen, and thus highlights on the careful prioritization of feedstocks mainly based on their economic and environmental loadings. Regarding the processing in biorefinery platforms, chemical composition of biomasses is important. Biomasses with higher concentrations of cellulose and hemicelluloses compared to lignin are preferred for bioethanol production in the lignocellulosic biorefinery, since the biodegradability of cellulose is higher than lignin. A green biorefinery platform enables the extraction of protein from grasses, producing an important alternative to importing protein sources for food products and animal feed, while also allowing processing of residues to deliver bioethanol. Currently, there are several approaches to integrate biorefinery platforms, which are aimed to enhance their economic and environmental sustainability. Regarding sustainability assessment, the complexities related to the material flows in a biorefinery and the delivery of alternative biobased products means dealing with multiple indicators in the decision-making process to enable comparisons of alternatives. Life Cycle Assessment is regarded as one of the most relevant tools to assess the environmental hotspots in the biomass supply chains, at processing stages and also to support in the prioritization of any specific biobased products and the alternatives delivered from biorefineries.

AB - The aim of the current paper is to discuss the sustainability aspect of biorefinery systems with focus on biomass supply chains, processing of biomass feedstocks in biorefinery platforms and sustainability assessment methodologies. From the stand point of sustainability, it is important to optimize the agricultural production system and minimize the related environmental impacts at the farming system level. These impacts are primarily related to agri-chemical inputs and the related undesired environmental emissions and to the repercussions from biomass production. At the same time, the biorefineries need a year-round supply of biomass and about 40-60% of the total operating cost of a typical biore finery is related to the feedstocks chosen, and thus highlights on the careful prioritization of feedstocks mainly based on their economic and environmental loadings. Regarding the processing in biorefinery platforms, chemical composition of biomasses is important. Biomasses with higher concentrations of cellulose and hemicelluloses compared to lignin are preferred for bioethanol production in the lignocellulosic biorefinery, since the biodegradability of cellulose is higher than lignin. A green biorefinery platform enables the extraction of protein from grasses, producing an important alternative to importing protein sources for food products and animal feed, while also allowing processing of residues to deliver bioethanol. Currently, there are several approaches to integrate biorefinery platforms, which are aimed to enhance their economic and environmental sustainability. Regarding sustainability assessment, the complexities related to the material flows in a biorefinery and the delivery of alternative biobased products means dealing with multiple indicators in the decision-making process to enable comparisons of alternatives. Life Cycle Assessment is regarded as one of the most relevant tools to assess the environmental hotspots in the biomass supply chains, at processing stages and also to support in the prioritization of any specific biobased products and the alternatives delivered from biorefineries.

KW - Biobased product

KW - Biomass feedstock

KW - Biorefinery

KW - Economic performances

KW - Environmental performances

KW - Life cycle assessment

KW - Sustainability

U2 - 10.1016/j.rser.2014.11.041

DO - 10.1016/j.rser.2014.11.041

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:84912098189

VL - 43

SP - 244

EP - 263

JO - Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews

JF - Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews

SN - 1364-0321

ER -

ID: 130099174